• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (2)
  •  

Johansen’s criticisms misplaced?

Published on March 11, 2013
Published on March 11, 2013
Topics :
Dear Editor , Labrador

Dear Editor,

Please update the photograph of Michael Johansen that accompanies his columns.

If his column as printed in the Aurora on March 4 is any indication, he’s probably looking more like Mellville’s white-whale-obsessed Captain Ahab.

Johansen’s rambling re-hash of obvious political cleavages in Labrador was unified by the odd assumption that every synapse and step of Peter Penashue regarding the Caribou hunt is driven by sinister calculations.

Like Ahab in “Moby Dick,” Johansen gives his white whale nowhere to go. If Penashue says x or y or z it’s clearly crass politics. And whichever he says, according to Johansen, he’s afraid of the truth.

Of course the reader never learns what Johansen thinks is the “truth.” At best, it seems he dislikes hydroelectric projects, mining and Conservatives. I hope such profound content isn’t expensive for the newspaper.

While asserting that Penashue was somehow dodging on the caribou issue, Johanesen then suggests that Penashue only ever follows “party line.” If that was true, then there’d be no room for dodging. Johansen needs to make up his mind.

Speaking of party lines, citizen engagement institute Semara studied all federal party caucuses and found Conservatives were the least bound to party lines. Penashue himself opposed the Prime Minister on a motion to have a committee study the definition of when life begins.

And Caribou? Their populations elsewhere have indeed been declining – even in vast areas not touched by development. You don’t need conspiracy theories to see the obvious reason why Peter Penashue focused on facts. You just need the Constitution. He’s a Federal Minister. The hunt is a provincial responsibility.

By focusing on the facts and not the fight, Penashue showed us that he’s in the right headspace. He remains a wise and effective representative for his riding and for our province.

 

Michael O'Brien

Buchans

Comments

  • Username
    Helen
    - April 8, 2013 at 23:54:06

    Great letter. Hard to imagine why the cryptic "Dave" would be grasping at those straws from his shadowy corner. One's associations/involvement or family members' involvements should not in any way affect how one views the content provided in a letter to the editor or in the comments section, or the arguments advanced by that person. It's a form of ad-hominem attack to waste time with those sorts of questions or attempts to passive aggressively dismiss that content and those arguments on that basis. Those who choose that school of politics should first have the decency to disclose their full name and any partisan associations or leanings. I've read other letters to the editor from Michael - he makes no secret of his leanings. What's far more important is what he has to say.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Dave
    - March 12, 2013 at 23:18:15

    Michael is your brother the O'Brien who works for the Conservative House Leader, in Peter Penashue's PCO department in Ottawa?

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

loading...

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Recent Announcements

Current Obituaries in The Labradorian

Find an Announcement

Find an Announcement

Labradorian Twitter

Advertising