• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (9)
  •  

NunatuKavut council challenges Muskrat Falls site work

One of the photos included in the NunatuKavut Community Council’s photo gallery of Muskrat Falls preliminary work. The council says a helicopter was chartered to allow the aboriginal group a view of the work completed. — Photo courtesy of NunatuKavut Community Council

One of the photos included in the NunatuKavut Community Council’s photo gallery of Muskrat Falls preliminary work. The council says a helicopter was chartered to allow the aboriginal group a view of the work completed. — Photo courtesy of...

Published on October 3, 2012
Published on October 3, 2012
Ashley Fitzpatrick  RSS Feed
The Telegram

Nalcor Energy representative says aboriginal group is wrong in claiming wrongdoing

Topics :
NunatuKavut Community Council , Nalcor Energy , The Telegram , Goose Bay

The NunatuKavut Community Council has accused Nalcor Energy of hiding the true extent of the on-site preliminary work for the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project.

The work includes creation of a new access road to the proposed dam site, addition of a power line and communications infrastructure. It is valued in the tens of millions of dollars.

At a news conference held at the NunatuKavut Community Council offices in Happy Valley-Goose Bay, council president Todd Russell pointed to photos taken during a helicopter flight over the work area Friday, Sept. 28.

He said the pictures show Nalcor has downplayed the amount of work being done around Muskrat Falls and violated federal Fisheries and environment regulations.

Locked out

“We are locked out of the site, denied reports and our aboriginal fisheries guardians were barred from doing a site inspection. Government and Nalcor talk publicly about a project that is about to happen — little does anyone know that construction is proceeding at a very rapid pace behind these closed and guarded gates,” he stated.

Gilbert Bennett, Nalcor Energy vice-president and Lower Churchill project leader, said the Crown corporation has been consulting with aboriginal groups, including Nun­atu­Kavut, throughout the development of the project to date.

Documentation filed during the environmental assessment process for the dam show NunatuKavut would have been aware of the project timeline and construction plans.

“There are a variety of permits that are required for the preliminary work and we’ve got all of those permits,” Bennett told The Telegram late Tuesday afternoon. “Various aboriginal groups, including NunatuKavut, have been consulted on those applications.”

Reason for limitations on site access

In stating his position, Russell repeatedly referred to a guarded security gate on an access road to the worksite, saying it is a sign of an attempt to keep the extent of the work under wraps.

Asked about the point, Bennett said limiting access to the area is part of a larger safety protocol, standard for Nalcor sites. It includes, among other things, a requirement that anyone looking to enter the work area be briefed about potential safety hazards.

“At the end of the day, (the) safety of everybody on the site is of paramount concern for us,” Bennett said.

As for the preliminary work planned for the site, “we’re getting toward the end of the program.”

Further work awaits a “go or no” decision on the project by the provincial government.

The Muskrat Falls dam work has been released from the environmental assessment process. The Labrador-Island Link, the bulk of the transmission infrastructure connected with the Lower Churchill development, is still being assessed.

The NunatuKavut Community Council has previously voiced objection to the environmental review process as it stands and to the project as a whole.

As The Telegram reported in a story published Sept. 17, Russell has described himself as, “absolutely against this project,” explaining he sees no benefit for the Inuit-Métis people living in the area.

“We’re getting run over,” said Ken Mesher, an elder within the NunatuKavut community who spoke alongside the council president Tuesday.

“They’re coming in and invading our territory. It’s not right. … We’ve got to stand up, take a stand on what’s happening.”

Earlier this week, members of NunatuKavut set up a road “slow down” area, as opposed to a road block, along part of the Trans-Labrador Highway to draw attention to their objections to the project as it stands.

“We are looking at our legal options,” Russell confirmed Tuesday. “In terms of our on-the-ground action, I can only say to you it will probably become more intense and more direct.”

However, he has offered to sit down with Nalcor and the provincial government to work through the issues raised.

“We have an extensive record of consultation with NunatuKavut. We certainly want to keep the lines of communication open,” Bennett said.

afitzpatrick@thetelegram.com

Comments

  • Username
    saelcove
    - October 5, 2012 at 10:02:34

    Not to worry Danny boy will explain it and all will be fine, Stunderdale just does not have what it takes

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    adolphus bailey
    - October 4, 2012 at 23:09:56

    The Native People of Labrador should have the say to anything going on. Remember you whites these people were here long before the whites arrived. Like the Native American Indians the Native Labradorians will eventually be forced to live in a small area with no land rights because of the whites interest in taking native lands away for their own PROFIT..

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    stephen
    - October 3, 2012 at 18:25:42

    So sick of hearing thse whiners.Nfld and Labrador belongs to all Nfld and Labradorians,and we will all benefit from Muskrat Falls even those that don,t want to work.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John smith
    - October 3, 2012 at 13:04:08

    Brad, when this deal was launched the mininig interests in Labrador were laying off people and shuttering operations. The world was in a huge recession, and no one was buying steel, not even the Chinese. So, as with most of your comments they have no basis in truth, and just add to the steaming pile of excrement that is the naysayer side of this debate.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      William Damiels
      - October 3, 2012 at 19:28:13

      Cabana is correct. Even one of your demi gods Wade Locke said today that the power was for the mining companies. Your synopsis on the mining interests is a load. How many lies have you told on here? Don't go away mad just ............

    • Username
      W McLean
      - October 4, 2012 at 12:44:59

      In 2010?

    • Username
      John Smith
      - October 4, 2012 at 16:19:46

      In 2009 Rio Tinto advised that they would not be going ahead with the multibillion dollar expansion of their mining operations in labrador...so to say that this was conceived in 2010 to appease the mining sector is ludicrous...as usual with Cabana...

  • Username
    Brad Cabana
    - October 3, 2012 at 10:30:51

    The reason Nalcor is pushing forward the development on the ground and pressure on the politicians for a sanction vote, is that they must have the dam operational on schedule for the mining developments in Labrador. Pure and simple.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Tired if it
    - October 3, 2012 at 07:41:56

    Just another attempt to grab more money that will dissapear withy no records.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

loading...

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Recent Announcements

Current Obituaries in The Labradorian

Find an Announcement

Find an Announcement

Labradorian Twitter

Advertising